News
Mischief 1 Is a Cheap Image-to-Video Model Built on Wan 2.2 With a "Neuron-Derived" Speedup: What Is Claimed and What Is Not Yet Tested
ยท RenderBob team
The Biological Computing Co. released Mischief 1 on 30 October, an image-to-video model built on Wan 2.2. It says the model is about five times faster at the same quality. No independent test is published.
The Biological Computing Co. (TBC) released Mischief 1, an image-to-video model, on 30 October. Its release says the model, built on Wan 2.2, generates video five times faster than that base model at the same quality. The Next Web reports the same claim and notes that TBC has not published an independent test.
What was released
TBC's release and The Next Web agree on the outline. Mischief 1 turns a start image into a short clip. It is built on Wan 2.2, Alibaba's open video model, and it is on fal and OpenRouter. TBC prices it at half a cent per second, so a five-second clip is 2.5 cents, and the release does not name a resolution. The Next Web gives the same per-second price and no resolution, length, or audio details.
Unite.AI, citing an OpenRouter listing, gives a split the other two pages do not: $0.005 per second at 480p and $0.01 per second at 720p, with clips of three or five seconds in 16:9. It also says the model is on TBC's own creation app. That Unite.AI article was written by an AI research agent and reviewed by the site's editors, so treat those listing details as second-hand until you read the fal or OpenRouter page yourself.
What "neuron-derived" means here
TBC says biology is used in the research, not in the product you run. The release says the company grows living neurons in the lab, turns the measurements into software, and that the neurons stay in the lab. Customers run the model on ordinary chips. The software adds less than 0.1% to the base model's parameter count. Unite.AI, describing TBC's adapter post, says the recordings used a chip with 4,096 electrodes and that the published study used Oasis, an interactive Minecraft video model, not Wan 2.2.
What the evidence is
- Speed. About five times faster than Wan 2.2 at the same quality, per TBC. No independent benchmark or test method is in the release or in The Next Web's report.
- Research behind it. The Decoder reports that on ten test videos TBC measured about 19% better results than the original Oasis model and about 5% better than a LoRA, and that the company has not published a controlled comparison against purely digital speedups. Unite.AI notes that the authors describe a narrow test setup, and that results varied with denoising settings.
- Outside test. The Decoder says Bluesky Compute reported about 4.4 times lower inference costs in July, for a follow-up project and not this commercial product.
- Production use. TBC's release quotes Wonder Studios co-founder Justin Hackney on faster, cheaper iteration. That is a customer's comment, not a controlled comparison.
- Energy. No energy measurements are reported, so an efficiency claim cannot be checked from these pages.
What is still missing
Nothing we read shows output quality side by side with other Wan 2.2 services, how closely clips follow the input image, or how often a clip is usable. Price per second is also not the whole cost, which the companion piece today explains.
What to watch
Independent speed and quality comparisons against Wan 2.2, whether 720p and longer clips are on the listing you actually use, and whether the AWS enterprise listings TBC announced in September go live.
RenderBob 3 and this story
RenderBob 3 makes the model a per-clip choice, so a new low-cost image-to-video option can be tried on a single shot, on its own timeline lane, before it touches the rest of the cut.
More from the blog
- The New York Times and Three Newspaper Publishers Sue Brave Over AI Scraping: What Is Alleged, and Why an Unnamed Crawler Matters for Opt-Outs
On 2 November the New York Times sued Brave Software in Manhattan, and three other US newspaper publishers filed a similar suit hours later. They allege Brave scrapes journalism and sells access to AI companies.
- Meta's AI Terms Face a Norwegian Injunction and a UK Investigation: A Timeline of the Week and What It Means for the 20 November Date
Since our 30 October piece, an Oslo court has temporarily banned Meta's revised business terms, and the UK CMA has opened an investigation. Meta says a consultation may run past 20 November.