News
Meta's AI Terms Face a Norwegian Injunction and a UK Investigation: A Timeline of the Week and What It Means for the 20 November Date
ยท RenderBob team
Since our 30 October piece, an Oslo court has temporarily banned Meta's revised business terms, and the UK CMA has opened an investigation. Meta says a consultation may run past 20 November.

Since our 30 October piece, an Oslo court has temporarily banned Meta's revised business terms, and the UK CMA has opened an investigation. Meta says a consultation may run past 20 November.
What happened, in order
The accounts below come from PPC Land and Resultsense, which summarise the regulator's announcement, Reuters and others. We did not read the UK government's page or the court decision.
- 23 October. Meta tells Reuters the terms will take effect on 20 November, not 30 October, as we reported.
- 27 October. The Norwegian Media Businesses' Association, acting for ten media companies including NRK, TV 2, Schibsted and Amedia, asks the Oslo District Court to block the changes.
- 28 October. The court issues a temporary ban the next day. AFP, as relayed by PPC Land, says it was issued on an emergency basis without hearing Meta. The association says Meta may not implement the changes until the courts finally decide whether they are lawful. Meta's communications chief Andy Stone says on X that the company does not plan to change policy "without a full consultation with industry groups and leaders", that this could run beyond 20 November, and that the existing terms stay until then. PPC Land and Resultsense describe this as a pause.
- 29 October. The Star, relaying AFP, reports that the Paris Court of Appeal rejected Meta's appeals against interim measures from France's competition authority. That case is about talks with press publishers and payment for news content, not the AI terms, and Meta said it was disappointed and would keep complying.
- 30 October. The UK Competition and Markets Authority opens a formal investigation.
What the UK investigation covers
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) says it is examining whether Meta abuses a dominant position under Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998. Its concern is that the terms could let Meta take content from business and publisher websites for its own products, including AI features, without giving businesses a choice. It says this could amount to an unlawful imposition of unfair trading conditions for thousands of UK businesses.
- The investigation covers Meta's "existing commercial terms, or revisions to those terms", and advertisers as well as publishers. PPC Land's reading is that a reworded version after the pause would also fall inside it.
- The CMA says "no assumptions should be made about whether competition law has been broken". It must first establish dominance in a UK market, which it has not defined, and its timetable is indicative.
- It lists initial information gathering from October 2026 to January 2027.
Where the accounts differ
The CMA's account is that the delay followed its "active engagement" with Meta. Meta said on 23 October that it wanted more time to explain the changes to partners. Meta told Reuters, as relayed by PPC Land, that its crawling terms apply only to its ads and business products and that site owners can still use robots.txt. The Norwegian association says the court agreed that Meta is dominant and that the terms are unreasonable, but those are the winning side's words and the written decision has not been published. Whether the order reaches only the ten applicants or more is also unclear.
What this means for the date
Nothing we read says the terms will take effect on 20 November. Meta says the existing terms remain until its consultation ends. The Norwegian order is interim and the UK case is at an early stage. The clause on crawling business websites that we described on 18 October has not been withdrawn. Treat the terms as paused.
What studios and creators can do
- Read the live terms on the date you rely on, not the reports about them.
- Keep unreleased material behind authentication. Our 1 November piece covers the shared training opt-out, which records a preference and does not control access.
- Check your own robots.txt and note what it says today.
- Keep a dated record of the terms you accepted.
- Watch for Meta's consultation, since changes may arrive with little notice.
- Ask your own adviser about the contract. This is not legal advice.
What to watch
The date and outcome of Meta's consultation, whether the Norwegian order is tested at a full hearing, what the CMA says after its first information gathering, and any revised wording from Meta.
RenderBob 3 and this story
RenderBob 3 keeps references and prompt logs with the studio and lets you choose local generation per clip, so a shot's material can stay on your machine while a platform's terms are still being decided.
More from the blog
- The New York Times and Three Newspaper Publishers Sue Brave Over AI Scraping: What Is Alleged, and Why an Unnamed Crawler Matters for Opt-Outs
On 2 November the New York Times sued Brave Software in Manhattan, and three other US newspaper publishers filed a similar suit hours later. They allege Brave scrapes journalism and sells access to AI companies.
- Mischief 1 Is a Cheap Image-to-Video Model Built on Wan 2.2 With a "Neuron-Derived" Speedup: What Is Claimed and What Is Not Yet Tested
The Biological Computing Co. released Mischief 1 on 30 October, an image-to-video model built on Wan 2.2. It says the model is about five times faster at the same quality. No independent test is published.